A voice from the grave
A hierarch who calls himself the “head of Orthodoxy” was secretly speaking with a man whom he himself had recognized as anathematized – and was negotiating with him about joining his own Church of Constantinople.
From beyond the grave, Filaret has revealed a small but telling piece of compromising evidence against Patriarch Bartholomew. It turns out that before 2008, the head of the UOC-KP flew to the Phanar to meet him and discuss the terms under which his structure might enter the Patriarchate of Constantinople. Until now, we knew that such negotiations had taken place indirectly; we knew that Filaret had written to Patriarch Bartholomew asking to be restored to his rank. But that Filaret and Bartholomew personally discussed the details of a future alliance in face-to-face meetings – this we have learned for the first time.
The point is that, officially, the Patriarch of Constantinople regarded Filaret as anathematized – that is, as a layman stripped of his rank and cut off from the Church. There is an official document to this effect, in which the Patriarch agrees with the ROC’s 1997 decision and states that no one in his Church’s hierarchy would maintain ecclesiastical communion with Filaret or his followers.
So it turns out that a hierarch who calls himself the “head of Orthodoxy” was secretly communicating with a man whom he himself had recognized as under anathema – and negotiating with him about entering his own Church of Constantinople.
We understand that no human being is perfect. Yet somewhere deep down, we still expect Church hierarchs to possess, if not holiness, then at least a certain moral stature. Or at the very least, an impeccable adherence to Christ’s not-so-difficult command: “Let what you say be simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’” (Matt. 5:37).
Otherwise, how are such hierarchs any different from politicians?
