"The UOC doesn’t hold funerals for soldiers": a lie-manufacturing machine
At the end of December, a wave of outrage swept across the internet over claims that UOC priests refused to serve a funeral for a fallen soldier in the Bukovynian village of Banyliv-Pidhirnyi. So what actually happened there?
One of the most widespread fakes about the “Moscow” UOC is the claim that it “refuses to bury” Ukrainian soldiers. The insinuation is always the same: the priests are supposedly so eager to curry favor with the Kremlin that they deny grieving families the Church’s final prayer over their dead heroes. The OCU repeats it, the media amplifies it, MPs chant it, activists echo it – and the story is served as “obvious truth.”
We want to show a textbook example of how such fakes are produced. At the end of December, the internet exploded with indignation over an alleged refusal by UOC clergy to hold a funeral for a soldier in the Bukovynian village of Banyliv-Pidhirnyi. What happened?
Every media outlet insisted that the UOC “wouldn’t let the procession with the body into the local church,” and therefore OCU clerics were “forced” to conduct the funeral in the village cultural center. A disgrace, they said. How could anyone not be furious?
But in reality, everything was “a little” different.
The soldier’s family originally wanted the funeral service in the UOC’s Ascension Church and agreed on an exact time with the rector. Then the OCU “patriots” stepped in. A “priest” called the rector and demanded to be allowed in to “concelebrate.” When he was refused, he moved straight to threats: during the service, he said, the body would be carried out and the church would be seized. And this is not hearsay – there is a recording of the conversation.
After that, pressure was put on the soldier’s mother, pushing her to consent to a funeral rite led by an OCU cleric. Somehow, that consent was obtained. And here is the key point: the Dumenko people did not take the hero’s body to one of their two churches in the village. They chose to stage their “service” in the cultural center. Why? The answer is obvious – for the suffering-photo-op. So they could say: look, good people, see how these “Muscovites” treat Ukrainian heroes – they won’t even let the family say farewell in a church.
And it worked. Photos from the village cultural center were blasted across the media, deliberately stirring outrage and hatred in readers.
But the soldier’s mother still managed to stand her ground. Her son was taken from the cultural center to the UOC’s Ascension Church, where twenty priests served the funeral for the fallen soldier. About that, of course, nobody reported a word. That silence added one more brushstroke to the manufactured portrait of the “FSB church” that supposedly “hates our heroes.”
And if you dig into any of these cases – “refused to serve a funeral,” “hid weapons,” “wouldn’t pray for heroes” – you will find the same pattern, with minor variations: lies wrapped in manipulation, staged into an image, and sold as reality.
One day, people will start saying this out loud.
But not today.
